Skip to content
Pharma Observatory a Scientist.com platform

Clinical trial

Is Lidocaine Really Guilty? A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Incidence of TNS After Intrathecal Lidocaine Administration vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia

NCT03862287 is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre as lead sponsor.

NCT NCT03862287
Email me this page as a PDF

Search trials, sites, companies and investigators, and follow each one to the others. Individual plan, $249/seat/mo. Card required.

Get the NCT03862287 report as a PDF

The PDF carries up to 50 rows of each section, where the page shows the first few, with the sources listed. Enter a work email and confirm it from the message we send, and the report follows by email.

Registry record

As filed in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Title
Is Lidocaine Really Guilty? A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Comparison of the Incidence of TNS After Intrathecal Lidocaine Administration vs. Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia
Lead sponsor
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Phase
Not applicable
Overall status
Unknown status
Start date
November 1, 2018
Completion date
December 31, 2019
Enrollment
160 (estimated)
Sites
1

Conditions

As the registry lists them; a condition with its own page is linked.

leg injuries, orthopedic disorder