Skip to content
Pharma Observatory a Scientist.com platform

Condition (MeSH)

Dilatation, Pathologic

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 109 trials for Dilatation, Pathologic or a narrower condition beneath it.

MeSH D004108 Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms C23
Email me this page as a PDF

Search trials, drugs, companies and investigators, and follow each one to the others. Individual plan, $249/seat/mo. Card required.

Phase 1 Phase 1 8 Phase 2 Phase 2 7 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 6 Phase 3 Phase 3 13 Phase 4 Phase 4 10 Not applicable Not applicable 41 Observational Observational 23 Expanded access Expanded access 1 Phase 1 Phase 1 8 Phase 2 Phase 2 7 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 6 Phase 3 Phase 3 13 Phase 4 Phase 4 10 Not applicable Not applicable 41 Observational Observational 23 Expanded access Expanded access 1

Trials per phase (log scale)

109 of the 109 trials are tagged with Dilatation, Pathologic itself; the rest are tagged with a narrower condition beneath it.

Get the Dilatation, Pathologic report as a PDF

The PDF carries up to 50 rows of each section, where the page shows the first few, with the sources listed. Enter a work email and confirm it from the message we send, and the report follows by email.

When did Dilatation, Pathologic trials start? (23)

Shown in this order: most recent first, 1990 onwards. 2026 is partial: trials registered with a 2026 start date so far, not a full year.

Trials over time, by phase

  • Phase 1
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 2/3
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 4
  • Not applicable
  • Observational

Top of scale: 9

1995: 1 trials (Phase 2 1) 2005: 1 trials (Phase 2 1) 2006: 2 trials (Phase 3 1, Phase 2/3 1) 2007: 3 trials (Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1, Phase 2/3 1) 2008: 5 trials (Not applicable 1, Phase 3 1, Phase 2/3 2, Phase 1 1) 2009: 4 trials (Observational 3, Phase 2/3 1) 2010: 7 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 1, Phase 3 3, Phase 2 1) 2011: 4 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1 1) 2012: 6 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 3, Phase 1 1) 2013: 7 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 3, Phase 1 1) 2014: 4 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 2, Phase 3 1) 2015: 3 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 2) 2016: 8 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 3, Phase 4 3, Phase 3 1) 2017: 3 trials (Observational 1, Phase 4 2) 2018: 4 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 1, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1) 2019: 6 trials (Not applicable 3, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1 1) 2020: 8 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 4, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1) 2021: 9 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 5, Phase 3 2) 2022: 2 trials (Phase 2 1, Phase 1 1) 2023: 6 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 4, Phase 1 1) 2024: 6 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 4, Phase 4 1) 2025: 6 trials (Not applicable 4, Phase 4 1, Phase 2/3 1)

Trials registered with a start date in each year, 1990 onward, stacked by phase (complete years only; the current partial year is in the table's notes). The table below lists the same counts, most recent years first.

Trials started per year
Year Trials started
2026 (partial year) 3
2025 6
2024 6
2023 6
2022 2
2021 9
2020 8
2019 6
2018 4
2017 3

Forecast of the full-year count, planned starts included, not rows of this table: about 4 trials starting in 2026 and about 5 in 2027, the average of the 24 months through September, counted as registered and carried forward. The rows of this table count trials registered so far with a start date in the year, planned starts included; the forecast looks ahead to the count for the whole year, so it is not the same measure. In backtests on conditions of this size, forecasts made part-way through the year were typically off by about 28 percent and ran about 20 percent low against the count later registered; forecasts made before the year began were off by about 39 percent and ran about 37 percent low against the count later registered. These figures rest on a few years of history (target years from 2018 to 2025, varying by figure), place each condition as it is mapped today rather than as it was then, and score against a count for the newest year that was still being revised. Only condition series were scored.

Prediction, not a registry value: median of 35 months from start to primary completion across 7 trials still running at the 2026-10-09 snapshot; registered median of 21 months across 67 trials with a primary completion typed Actual. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov / AACT (CTTI), public domain.

What phase are Dilatation, Pathologic trials in? (8)

Shown in this order: phase order.

Show the trials by phase as a table
Trials by phase
Phase Trials
Phase 1 8
Phase 2 7
Phase 2/3 6
Phase 3 13
Phase 4 10
Not applicable 41
Observational 23
Expanded access 1

How many Dilatation, Pathologic trials are recruiting? (9)

Shown in this order: the order a trial moves through, from not yet recruiting to unknown.

Trials by recruitment status
Status Trials
Not yet recruiting 1
Recruiting 12
Enrolling by invitation 1
Active, not recruiting 3
Completed 58

Status as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Each trial is counted once.

Which lead sponsors run the most Dilatation, Pathologic trials? (5)

Shown in this order: most trials first. Lead sponsors the registry classes as industry, NIH, US federal, other government or network. A hospital or university the registry files as government can appear here. Sponsors it classes as academic or other are shown on the full page, because that class cannot separate an institution from a named investigator.

Lead sponsors
Sponsor Trials
Cxlusa 4
Ocuphire Pharma, Inc. 4
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 2
Sheba Medical Center 2
Topcon Medical Systems, Inc. 2

Which drugs are being tested for Dilatation, Pathologic? (2)

Shown in this order: most trials first. One row per drug, matched to a single molecule under all its names, ranked by number of trials.

Drugs tested
Drug Trials
MisoprostoL 6
Mifepristone 3

Interventions as named in the registry (13)

Shown in this order: most trials first.

Interventions as named in the registry
Drug Trials
Riboflavin 7
Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution Vehicle 4
Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution 0.75% 3
IM Oxytocin 2
Riboflavin 0.1% ophthalmic solution 2

These are the names sponsors entered on ClinicalTrials.gov that we have not matched to a single molecule. Some are drugs under a brand or code name; others are procedures, doses or arm labels.

Which serious adverse events do Dilatation, Pathologic trials report? (10)

Shown in this order: most subjects affected first. Subjects affected summed across trials, a cross-trial signal, not a rate.

Serious adverse events in this condition's trials
Adverse event Subjects affected Trials
Angina pectoris 3 1
Uterine Perforation 3 1
Atrial septal defect 2 1
Cardiac failure congestive 2 1
Cerebrovascular accident 2 2

Which publications cover Dilatation, Pathologic? (283)

Shown in this order: major-topic papers first, then newest, then most linked to trials.

Publications
Publication Journal Year Major topic
Enhanced Ectasia Detection Using Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics. American journal of ophthalmology 2019 Yes
Dural ectasia in Marfan syndrome and other hereditary connective tissue disorders: a 10-year follow-up study. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society 2019 Yes
Transoral outlet reduction: a comparison of purse-string with interrupted stitch technique. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2018 Yes
Olfactory cleft dilatation. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases 2018 Yes
Epithelium-off versus transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive corneal ectasia: a randomised and controlled trial. The British journal of ophthalmology 2017 Yes

Not on this page

Not measured: delivery record.

Checked, with nothing recorded for this condition: prevalence, rare-disease identity, and sub-conditions in mesh.

Browse all condition evidence pages