Skip to content
Pharma Observatory a Scientist.com platform

Condition (MeSH)

Hyperbilirubinemia

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 319 trials for Hyperbilirubinemia or a narrower condition beneath it. Picterus AS has the most among industry and government lead sponsors, with 11.

MeSH D006932 Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms C23
Email me this page as a PDF

Search trials, drugs, companies and investigators, and follow each one to the others. Individual plan, $249/seat/mo. Card required.

Phase 1 Phase 1 5 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 6 Phase 2 Phase 2 22 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 4 Phase 3 Phase 3 10 Phase 4 Phase 4 14 Not applicable Not applicable 153 Observational Observational 103 Phase 1 Phase 1 5 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 6 Phase 2 Phase 2 22 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 4 Phase 3 Phase 3 10 Phase 4 Phase 4 14 Not applicable Not applicable 153 Observational Observational 103

Trials per phase (log scale)

2 more sections with rows

79 of the 319 trials are tagged with Hyperbilirubinemia itself; the rest are tagged with a narrower condition beneath it.

Get the Hyperbilirubinemia report as a PDF

The PDF carries up to 50 rows of each section, where the page shows the first few, with the sources listed. Enter a work email and confirm it from the message we send, and the report follows by email.

When did Hyperbilirubinemia trials start? (28)

Shown in this order: most recent first, 1990 onwards. 2026 is partial: trials registered with a 2026 start date so far, not a full year.

Trials over time, by phase

  • Phase 1
  • Phase 1/2
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 2/3
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 4
  • Not applicable
  • Observational
  • Other (Unknown)

Top of scale: 30

1991: 1 trials (Observational 1) 1993: 1 trials (Not applicable 1) 1999: 3 trials (Phase 2 3) 2002: 2 trials (Phase 3 2) 2003: 3 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 2) 2004: 1 trials (Observational 1) 2005: 4 trials (Observational 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 1) 2006: 6 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 1, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 2) 2007: 5 trials (Observational 2, Phase 2 2, Phase 1 1) 2008: 9 trials (Observational 4, Not applicable 3, Phase 2 2) 2009: 8 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 3, Phase 4 2, Phase 2 1) 2010: 10 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 2, Phase 4 3) 2011: 12 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 5, Phase 3 2) 2012: 7 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 3, Phase 2 1) 2013: 10 trials (Observational 4, Not applicable 4, Phase 4 1, Phase 2 1) 2014: 14 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 7, Phase 4 1, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 2 2, Phase 1/2 1) 2015: 11 trials (Observational 4, Not applicable 5, Phase 4 2) 2016: 16 trials (Observational 4, Not applicable 9, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1/2 1) 2017: 15 trials (Other 1, Observational 4, Not applicable 7, Phase 3 3) 2018: 21 trials (Observational 7, Not applicable 11, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1 1) 2019: 20 trials (Observational 8, Not applicable 10, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 1) 2020: 16 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 11) 2021: 13 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 9, Phase 2 1) 2022: 23 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 17) 2023: 21 trials (Observational 9, Not applicable 11, Phase 4 1) 2024: 30 trials (Observational 11, Not applicable 12, Phase 4 2, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 2 2, Phase 1/2 2) 2025: 20 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 8, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 2 4, Phase 1 1)

Trials registered with a start date in each year, 1990 onward, stacked by phase (complete years only; the current partial year is in the table's notes). The table below lists the same counts, most recent years first.

Trials started per year
Year Trials started
2026 (partial year) 16
2025 20
2024 30
2023 21
2022 23
2021 13
2020 16
2019 20
2018 21
2017 15

Forecast of the full-year count, planned starts included, not rows of this table: about 20 trials starting in 2026 and about 20 in 2027, the average of the 24 months through September, counted as registered and carried forward, with about 0.7 times the starts already registered for the rest of 2026 added. The rows of this table count trials registered so far with a start date in the year, planned starts included; the forecast looks ahead to the count for the whole year, so it is not the same measure. In backtests on conditions of this size, forecasts made part-way through the year were typically off by about 15 percent and ran about 1 percent high against the count later registered; forecasts made before the year began were off by about 26 percent and ran about 20 percent low against the count later registered. The part-way figures are from forecasts that used a multiple fitted only on earlier years. These figures rest on a few years of history (target years from 2018 to 2025, varying by figure), place each condition as it is mapped today rather than as it was then, and score against a count for the newest year that was still being revised. Only condition series were scored.

Prediction, not a registry value: median of 30 months from start to primary completion across 23 trials still running at the 2026-10-09 snapshot; registered median of 16 months across 189 trials with a primary completion typed Actual. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov / AACT (CTTI), public domain.

What phase are Hyperbilirubinemia trials in? (10)

Shown in this order: phase order.

Show the trials by phase as a table
Trials by phase
Phase Trials
Phase 1 5
Phase 1/2 6
Phase 2 22
Phase 2/3 4
Phase 3 10
Phase 4 14
Not applicable 153
Observational 103
Expanded access 1
Unknown 1

How many Hyperbilirubinemia trials are recruiting? (9)

Shown in this order: the order a trial moves through, from not yet recruiting to unknown.

Trials by recruitment status
Status Trials
Not yet recruiting 18
Recruiting 21
Enrolling by invitation 2
Active, not recruiting 7
Completed 168

Status as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Each trial is counted once.

Which lead sponsors run the most Hyperbilirubinemia trials? (2)

Shown in this order: most trials first. Lead sponsors the registry classes as industry, NIH, US federal, other government or network. A hospital or university the registry files as government can appear here. Sponsors it classes as academic or other are shown on the full page, because that class cannot separate an institution from a named investigator.

Lead sponsors
Sponsor Trials
Picterus AS 11
InfaCare Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a Mallinckrodt Company 8

Which drugs are being tested for Hyperbilirubinemia? (3)

Shown in this order: most trials first. One row per drug, matched to a single molecule under all its names, ranked by number of trials.

Drugs tested
Drug Trials
tin mesoporphyrin 8
Ursodeoxycholic Acid 4
Methylene Blue 2

Interventions as named in the registry (12)

Shown in this order: most trials first.

Interventions as named in the registry
Drug Trials
Delayed Cord Clamping (DCC) 5
Fenofibrate IDD-P (Insoluble Drug Delivery-Micro Particle) 4
Remaxol 3
N Acetylcysteine 2
Control (placebo) group 2

These are the names sponsors entered on ClinicalTrials.gov that we have not matched to a single molecule. Some are drugs under a brand or code name; others are procedures, doses or arm labels.

Which serious adverse events do Hyperbilirubinemia trials report? (10)

Shown in this order: most subjects affected first. Subjects affected summed across trials, a cross-trial signal, not a rate.

Serious adverse events in this condition's trials
Adverse event Subjects affected Trials
Nervous system disorder 48 1
Infections and Infestations 37 1
Cardiac disorders 35 1
Investigations 30 1
Gastrointestinal disorders 22 1

Which publications cover Hyperbilirubinemia? (116)

Shown in this order: major-topic papers first, then newest, then most linked to trials.

Sub-conditions in MeSH (3)

MeSH descendants one level down with at least one trial, most trials first.

Not on this page

Not measured: delivery record.

Checked, with nothing recorded for this condition: prevalence and rare-disease identity.

Browse all condition evidence pages