Skip to content
Pharma Observatory a Scientist.com platform

Condition (MeSH)

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 650 trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse or a narrower condition beneath it. Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital has the most among industry and government lead sponsors, with 8.

MeSH D056887 Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms C23
Email me this page as a PDF

Search trials, drugs, companies and investigators, and follow each one to the others. Individual plan, $249/seat/mo. Card required.

Phase 1 Phase 1 3 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 4 Phase 2 Phase 2 9 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 3 Phase 3 Phase 3 18 Phase 4 Phase 4 44 Not applicable Not applicable 346 Observational Observational 223 Phase 1 Phase 1 3 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 4 Phase 2 Phase 2 9 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 3 Phase 3 Phase 3 18 Phase 4 Phase 4 44 Not applicable Not applicable 346 Observational Observational 223

Trials per phase (log scale)

512 of the 650 trials are tagged with Pelvic Organ Prolapse itself; the rest are tagged with a narrower condition beneath it.

Get the Pelvic Organ Prolapse report as a PDF

The PDF carries up to 50 rows of each section, where the page shows the first few, with the sources listed. Enter a work email and confirm it from the message we send, and the report follows by email.

When did Pelvic Organ Prolapse trials start? (28)

Shown in this order: most recent first, 1990 onwards. 2026 is partial: trials registered with a 2026 start date so far, not a full year.

Trials over time, by phase

  • Phase 1
  • Phase 1/2
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 2/3
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 4
  • Not applicable
  • Observational

Top of scale: 48

1996: 1 trials (Phase 3 1) 2000: 1 trials (Not applicable 1) 2001: 1 trials (Not applicable 1) 2002: 6 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 3, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1) 2003: 4 trials (Phase 4 1, Phase 3 2, Phase 1/2 1) 2004: 7 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 3, Phase 4 1) 2005: 9 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 6, Phase 4 1, Phase 1/2 1) 2006: 14 trials (Observational 4, Not applicable 7, Phase 4 2, Phase 2/3 1) 2007: 19 trials (Observational 8, Not applicable 6, Phase 4 3, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 2 1) 2008: 16 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 5, Phase 4 4, Phase 3 1) 2009: 15 trials (Observational 9, Not applicable 5, Phase 2 1) 2010: 23 trials (Observational 9, Not applicable 12, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1) 2011: 30 trials (Observational 22, Not applicable 5, Phase 4 2, Phase 3 1) 2012: 28 trials (Observational 12, Not applicable 14, Phase 4 1, Phase 1 1) 2013: 17 trials (Observational 4, Not applicable 9, Phase 4 3, Phase 3 1) 2014: 36 trials (Observational 11, Not applicable 20, Phase 4 4, Phase 2 1) 2015: 31 trials (Observational 10, Not applicable 17, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 2) 2016: 42 trials (Observational 12, Not applicable 27, Phase 4 3) 2017: 37 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 23, Phase 4 4, Phase 3 2, Phase 2 1, Phase 1/2 1) 2018: 34 trials (Observational 14, Not applicable 17, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1, Phase 2/3 1) 2019: 48 trials (Observational 16, Not applicable 28, Phase 4 2, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 1) 2020: 33 trials (Observational 15, Not applicable 15, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 1) 2021: 38 trials (Observational 11, Not applicable 21, Phase 4 3, Phase 2 1, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 1) 2022: 40 trials (Observational 14, Not applicable 24, Phase 3 1, Phase 1 1) 2023: 36 trials (Observational 14, Not applicable 19, Phase 4 2, Phase 3 1) 2024: 36 trials (Observational 9, Not applicable 25, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1) 2025: 30 trials (Observational 9, Not applicable 21)

Trials registered with a start date in each year, 1990 onward, stacked by phase (complete years only; the current partial year is in the table's notes). The table below lists the same counts, most recent years first.

Trials started per year
Year Trials started
2026 (partial year) 16
2025 30
2024 36
2023 36
2022 40
2021 38
2020 33
2019 48
2018 34
2017 37

Forecast of the full-year count, planned starts included, not rows of this table: about 21 trials starting in 2026 and about 24 in 2027, the average of the 24 months through September, counted as registered and carried forward, with about 0.7 times the starts already registered for the rest of 2026 added. The rows of this table count trials registered so far with a start date in the year, planned starts included; the forecast looks ahead to the count for the whole year, so it is not the same measure. In backtests on conditions of this size, forecasts made part-way through the year were typically off by about 15 percent and ran about 1 percent high against the count later registered; forecasts made before the year began were off by about 26 percent and ran about 20 percent low against the count later registered. The part-way figures are from forecasts that used a multiple fitted only on earlier years. These figures rest on a few years of history (target years from 2018 to 2025, varying by figure), place each condition as it is mapped today rather than as it was then, and score against a count for the newest year that was still being revised. Only condition series were scored.

Prediction, not a registry value: median of 35 months from start to primary completion across 51 trials still running at the 2026-10-09 snapshot; registered median of 23 months across 411 trials with a primary completion typed Actual. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov / AACT (CTTI), public domain.

What phase are Pelvic Organ Prolapse trials in? (8)

Shown in this order: phase order.

Show the trials by phase as a table
Trials by phase
Phase Trials
Phase 1 3
Phase 1/2 4
Phase 2 9
Phase 2/3 3
Phase 3 18
Phase 4 44
Not applicable 346
Observational 223

How many Pelvic Organ Prolapse trials are recruiting? (8)

Shown in this order: the order a trial moves through, from not yet recruiting to unknown.

Trials by recruitment status
Status Trials
Not yet recruiting 19
Recruiting 48
Enrolling by invitation 7
Active, not recruiting 30
Completed 364

Status as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Each trial is counted once.

Which lead sponsors run the most Pelvic Organ Prolapse trials? (3)

Shown in this order: most trials first. Lead sponsors the registry classes as industry, NIH, US federal, other government or network. A hospital or university the registry files as government can appear here. Sponsors it classes as academic or other are shown on the full page, because that class cannot separate an institution from a named investigator.

Lead sponsors
Sponsor Trials
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital 8
Ethicon, Inc. 7
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 6

Which drugs are being tested for Pelvic Organ Prolapse? (4)

Shown in this order: most trials first. One row per drug, matched to a single molecule under all its names, ranked by number of trials.

Drugs tested
Drug Trials
+/- Bupivacaine HCl 6
Estradiol 2
Estriol 2
Suzetrigine 2

Interventions as named in the registry (11)

Shown in this order: most trials first.

Interventions as named in the registry
Drug Trials
Dexamethasone/Dexamethasone acetate 4
Gabapentin 6% 3
Pudendal Nerve Block 2
Standard Care 2
PMT 2

These are the names sponsors entered on ClinicalTrials.gov that we have not matched to a single molecule. Some are drugs under a brand or code name; others are procedures, doses or arm labels.

Which serious adverse events do Pelvic Organ Prolapse trials report? (10)

Shown in this order: most subjects affected first. Subjects affected summed across trials, a cross-trial signal, not a rate.

Serious adverse events in this condition's trials
Adverse event Subjects affected Trials
any Serious Adverse Event 56 1
Extrusion 24 1
Prolapse 17 3
Bladder injury 16 3
Serious adverse event (Clavidien dindo IV) 15 1

Which publications cover Pelvic Organ Prolapse? (541)

Shown in this order: major-topic papers first, then newest, then most linked to trials.

Sub-conditions in MeSH (4)

MeSH descendants one level down with at least one trial, most trials first.

Not on this page

Not measured: delivery record.

Checked, with nothing recorded for this condition: prevalence and rare-disease identity.

Browse all condition evidence pages