Skip to content
Pharma Observatory a Scientist.com platform

Clinical trial

Conventional Vs. Optimised Periprocedural Analgosedation Vs. Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Pulsed-field Ablation: a Randomised Controlled Trial

NCT06013345 is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with Charles University, Czech Republic as lead sponsor.

Email me this page as a PDF

Search trials, sites, companies and investigators, and follow each one to the others. Individual plan, $249/seat/mo. Card required.

Get the NCT06013345 report as a PDF

The PDF carries up to 50 rows of each section, where the page shows the first few, with the sources listed. Enter a work email and confirm it from the message we send, and the report follows by email.

Registry record

As filed in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Title
Conventional Vs. Optimised Periprocedural Analgosedation Vs. Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Pulsed-field Ablation: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Lead sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic
Phase
Phase 3
Overall status
Completed
Start date
October 25, 2023
Completion date
December 1, 2024
Enrollment
127 (actual)
Sites
1

Conditions

As the registry lists them; a condition with its own page is linked.