Skip to content
Pharma Observatory a Scientist.com platform

Condition (MeSH)

Hemophilia B

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 259 trials for Hemophilia B or a narrower condition beneath it. Novo Nordisk A/S has the most among industry and government lead sponsors, with 36.

MeSH D002836 Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases C15 C16 Listed by Orphanet as a rare disease
Email me this page as a PDF

Search trials, drugs, companies and investigators, and follow each one to the others. Individual plan, $249/seat/mo. Card required.

Phase 1 Phase 1 35 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 18 Phase 2 Phase 2 15 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 5 Phase 3 Phase 3 51 Phase 4 Phase 4 15 Not applicable Not applicable 17 Observational Observational 103 Phase 1 Phase 1 35 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 18 Phase 2 Phase 2 15 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 5 Phase 3 Phase 3 51 Phase 4 Phase 4 15 Not applicable Not applicable 17 Observational Observational 103

Trials per phase (log scale)

259 of the 259 trials are tagged with Hemophilia B itself; the rest are tagged with a narrower condition beneath it.

Get the Hemophilia B report as a PDF

The PDF carries up to 50 rows of each section, where the page shows the first few, with the sources listed. Enter a work email and confirm it from the message we send, and the report follows by email.

When did Hemophilia B trials start? (29)

Shown in this order: most recent first, 1990 onwards. 2026 is partial: trials registered with a 2026 start date so far, not a full year. 3 trials are registered to start in 2027 or later, and not listed here.

Trials over time, by phase

  • Phase 1
  • Phase 1/2
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 2/3
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 4
  • Not applicable
  • Observational

Top of scale: 17

1992: 1 trials (Phase 1/2 1) 1997: 2 trials (Phase 3 2) 2000: 1 trials (Phase 3 1) 2001: 1 trials (Phase 4 1) 2002: 3 trials (Observational 1, Phase 3 1, Phase 1 1) 2003: 1 trials (Phase 4 1) 2004: 1 trials (Phase 1/2 1) 2005: 8 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 1, Phase 3 3, Phase 2 1, Phase 1 1) 2006: 1 trials (Observational 1) 2007: 5 trials (Observational 3, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 1) 2008: 7 trials (Observational 3, Phase 4 2, Phase 3 1, Phase 1 1) 2009: 14 trials (Observational 4, Phase 3 4, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1 4) 2010: 11 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 1, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 2, Phase 1 4) 2011: 13 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 1, Phase 3 5, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 3) 2012: 11 trials (Observational 1, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 4, Phase 2/3 2, Phase 1 3) 2013: 8 trials (Observational 4, Phase 3 2, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 1) 2014: 13 trials (Observational 6, Phase 3 4, Phase 1 3) 2015: 15 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 1, Phase 4 1, Phase 2 2, Phase 1/2 3, Phase 1 3) 2016: 8 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 1, Phase 1 1) 2017: 15 trials (Observational 10, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 2) 2018: 17 trials (Observational 9, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 4, Phase 2 1, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 1) 2019: 15 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 2, Phase 3 1, Phase 2 3, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 2) 2020: 12 trials (Observational 7, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 2, Phase 2 1, Phase 1/2 1) 2021: 14 trials (Observational 7, Not applicable 1, Phase 4 2, Phase 3 1, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 1) 2022: 13 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 2, Phase 3 4, Phase 1/2 2) 2023: 15 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 2, Phase 4 2, Phase 2 2, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 2) 2024: 14 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 1, Phase 3 4, Phase 1/2 3, Phase 1 1) 2025: 4 trials (Observational 3, Phase 3 1)

Trials registered with a start date in each year, 1990 onward, stacked by phase (complete years only; the current partial year is in the table's notes). The table below lists the same counts, most recent years first.

Trials started per year
Year Trials started
2026 (partial year) 10
2025 4
2024 14
2023 15
2022 13
2021 14
2020 12
2019 15
2018 17
2017 15

Forecast of the full-year count, planned starts included, not rows of this table: about 8 trials starting in 2026 and about 8 in 2027, the average of the 24 months through September, counted as registered and carried forward. The rows of this table count trials registered so far with a start date in the year, planned starts included; the forecast looks ahead to the count for the whole year, so it is not the same measure. In backtests on conditions of this size, forecasts made part-way through the year were typically off by about 28 percent and ran about 20 percent low against the count later registered; forecasts made before the year began were off by about 39 percent and ran about 37 percent low against the count later registered. These figures rest on a few years of history (target years from 2018 to 2025, varying by figure), place each condition as it is mapped today rather than as it was then, and score against a count for the newest year that was still being revised. Only condition series were scored. The 2026 forecast is below the 10 already registered with a 2026 start date: at the cutoff, 4 trials were already registered to start in October to December, more than the method's monthly average allows for, and the method does not use those planned starts.

Prediction, not a registry value: median of 36 months from start to primary completion across 16 trials still running at the 2026-10-09 snapshot; registered median of 24 months across 179 trials with a primary completion typed Actual. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov / AACT (CTTI), public domain.

What phase are Hemophilia B trials in? (8)

Shown in this order: phase order.

Show the trials by phase as a table
Trials by phase
Phase Trials
Phase 1 35
Phase 1/2 18
Phase 2 15
Phase 2/3 5
Phase 3 51
Phase 4 15
Not applicable 17
Observational 103

How many Hemophilia B trials are recruiting? (8)

Shown in this order: the order a trial moves through, from not yet recruiting to unknown.

Trials by recruitment status
Status Trials
Not yet recruiting 10
Recruiting 28
Enrolling by invitation 5
Active, not recruiting 6
Completed 157

Status as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Each trial is counted once.

Which lead sponsors run the most Hemophilia B trials? (11)

Shown in this order: most trials first. Lead sponsors the registry classes as industry, NIH, US federal, other government or network. A hospital or university the registry files as government can appear here. Sponsors it classes as academic or other are shown on the full page, because that class cannot separate an institution from a named investigator.

Lead sponsors
Sponsor Trials
Novo Nordisk A/S 36
Pfizer 21
Baxalta now part of Shire 17
CSL Behring 17
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer 11

Which drugs are being tested for Hemophilia B? (9)

Shown in this order: most trials first. One row per drug, matched to a single molecule under all its names, ranked by number of trials.

Drugs tested
Drug Trials
BENEFIX 18
Nonacog beta pegol 10
rFIXFc 9
activated recombinant human factor VII 9
Fresh Frozen Plasma 7

Interventions as named in the registry (6)

Shown in this order: most trials first.

Interventions as named in the registry
Drug Trials
No treatment given 9
Replenine®-VF (High Purity Factor IX) 5
SerpinPC 4
rFIX 3
Factor IX 3

These are the names sponsors entered on ClinicalTrials.gov that we have not matched to a single molecule. Some are drugs under a brand or code name; others are procedures, doses or arm labels.

Which serious adverse events do Hemophilia B trials report? (10)

Shown in this order: most subjects affected first. Subjects affected summed across trials, a cross-trial signal, not a rate.

Serious adverse events in this condition's trials
Adverse event Subjects affected Trials
Fall 25 5
Haemarthrosis 18 10
Haemophilic arthropathy 16 7
Pneumonia 16 9
Head injury 14 7

Which publications cover Hemophilia B? (162)

Shown in this order: major-topic papers first, then newest, then most linked to trials.

Prevalence (303)

Shown in this order: jurisdiction, then disease name. Orphanet observation for the mapped ORPHA concept; the mapping relation column says whether that concept is exactly this condition or broader or narrower.

Prevalence
Orphanet disease Type Class Geography Jurisdiction Mapping relation
Hemophilia B Point prevalence 1-9 / 100 000 United Kingdom GB Exact
Hemophilia B Point prevalence 1-9 / 100 000 United Kingdom GB Unspecified
Hemophilia B Point prevalence 1-9 / 100 000 United Kingdom GB Exact
Hemophilia B Point prevalence 1-9 / 1 000 000 Malaysia Not stated Unspecified
Hemophilia B Point prevalence 1-9 / 1 000 000 Nicaragua Not stated Exact

Rare-disease identity (2)

Shown in this order: exact, broader, narrower, other.

Rare-disease identity
Orphanet disease ORPHA code Relation Source
Hemophilia B 98879 Exact Orphanet Rare Disease Ontology (ORDO)
Hemophilia B 98879 Exact Orphadata Science knowledge files, Product 1

Not on this page

Not measured: delivery record.

Checked, with nothing recorded for this condition: sub-conditions in mesh.

Browse all condition evidence pages