Skip to content
Pharma Observatory a Scientist.com platform

Condition (MeSH)

Spondylolysis

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 209 trials for Spondylolysis or a narrower condition beneath it. Zimmer Biomet has the most among industry and government lead sponsors, with 7.

MeSH D013169 Musculoskeletal Diseases C05
Email me this page as a PDF

Search trials, drugs, companies and investigators, and follow each one to the others. Individual plan, $249/seat/mo. Card required.

Phase 1 Phase 1 3 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 7 Phase 2 Phase 2 3 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 1 Phase 3 Phase 3 7 Phase 4 Phase 4 14 Not applicable Not applicable 105 Observational Observational 69 Phase 1 Phase 1 3 Phase 1/2 Phase 1/2 7 Phase 2 Phase 2 3 Phase 2/3 Phase 2/3 1 Phase 3 Phase 3 7 Phase 4 Phase 4 14 Not applicable Not applicable 105 Observational Observational 69

Trials per phase (log scale)

13 of the 209 trials are tagged with Spondylolysis itself; the rest are tagged with a narrower condition beneath it.

Get the Spondylolysis report as a PDF

The PDF carries up to 50 rows of each section, where the page shows the first few, with the sources listed. Enter a work email and confirm it from the message we send, and the report follows by email.

When did Spondylolysis trials start? (26)

Shown in this order: most recent first, 1990 onwards. 2026 is partial: trials registered with a 2026 start date so far, not a full year.

Trials over time, by phase

  • Phase 1
  • Phase 1/2
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 2/3
  • Phase 3
  • Phase 4
  • Not applicable
  • Observational

Top of scale: 17

2000: 2 trials (Observational 1, Phase 4 1) 2001: 1 trials (Not applicable 1) 2002: 2 trials (Not applicable 1, Phase 3 1) 2004: 2 trials (Observational 1, Phase 4 1) 2005: 3 trials (Not applicable 2, Phase 3 1) 2006: 4 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 2, Phase 3 1) 2007: 5 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 1, Phase 4 1, Phase 1/2 1) 2008: 4 trials (Not applicable 1, Phase 1/2 3) 2009: 4 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 1, Phase 2 1) 2010: 6 trials (Observational 1, Not applicable 3, Phase 4 1, Phase 2 1) 2011: 5 trials (Not applicable 3, Phase 4 1, Phase 3 1) 2012: 9 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 5, Phase 1/2 1) 2013: 9 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 6) 2014: 13 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 8) 2015: 13 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 6, Phase 4 1) 2016: 15 trials (Observational 3, Not applicable 8, Phase 4 1, Phase 2/3 1, Phase 2 1, Phase 1 1) 2017: 8 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 4, Phase 4 1, Phase 1/2 1) 2018: 10 trials (Observational 4, Not applicable 5, Phase 3 1) 2019: 14 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 8, Phase 4 1) 2020: 17 trials (Observational 6, Not applicable 7, Phase 3 2, Phase 1/2 1, Phase 1 1) 2021: 12 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 7) 2022: 15 trials (Observational 7, Not applicable 6, Phase 4 2) 2023: 7 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 4, Phase 4 1) 2024: 14 trials (Observational 5, Not applicable 7, Phase 4 2) 2025: 7 trials (Observational 2, Not applicable 5)

Trials registered with a start date in each year, 1990 onward, stacked by phase (complete years only; the current partial year is in the table's notes). The table below lists the same counts, most recent years first.

Trials started per year
Year Trials started
2026 (partial year) 8
2025 7
2024 14
2023 7
2022 15
2021 12
2020 17
2019 14
2018 10
2017 8

Forecast of the full-year count, planned starts included, not rows of this table: about 9 trials starting in 2026 and about 8 in 2027, the average of the 24 months through September, counted as registered and carried forward. The rows of this table count trials registered so far with a start date in the year, planned starts included; the forecast looks ahead to the count for the whole year, so it is not the same measure. In backtests on conditions of this size, forecasts made part-way through the year were typically off by about 28 percent and ran about 20 percent low against the count later registered; forecasts made before the year began were off by about 39 percent and ran about 37 percent low against the count later registered. These figures rest on a few years of history (target years from 2018 to 2025, varying by figure), place each condition as it is mapped today rather than as it was then, and score against a count for the newest year that was still being revised. Only condition series were scored.

Prediction, not a registry value: median of 36 months from start to primary completion across 15 trials still running at the 2026-10-09 snapshot; registered median of 38 months across 124 trials with a primary completion typed Actual. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov / AACT (CTTI), public domain.

What phase are Spondylolysis trials in? (8)

Shown in this order: phase order.

Show the trials by phase as a table
Trials by phase
Phase Trials
Phase 1 3
Phase 1/2 7
Phase 2 3
Phase 2/3 1
Phase 3 7
Phase 4 14
Not applicable 105
Observational 69

How many Spondylolysis trials are recruiting? (9)

Shown in this order: the order a trial moves through, from not yet recruiting to unknown.

Trials by recruitment status
Status Trials
Not yet recruiting 8
Recruiting 21
Enrolling by invitation 6
Active, not recruiting 10
Completed 86

Status as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Each trial is counted once.

Which lead sponsors run the most Spondylolysis trials? (11)

Shown in this order: most trials first. Lead sponsors the registry classes as industry, NIH, US federal, other government or network. A hospital or university the registry files as government can appear here. Sponsors it classes as academic or other are shown on the full page, because that class cannot separate an institution from a named investigator.

Lead sponsors
Sponsor Trials
Zimmer Biomet 7
Aesculap AG 4
Baxano Surgical, Inc. 4
NuVasive 4
K2M, Inc. 3

Which drugs are being tested for Spondylolysis? (1)

Shown in this order: most trials first. One row per drug, matched to a single molecule under all its names, ranked by number of trials.

Drugs tested
Drug Trials
+/- Bupivacaine HCl 2

Interventions as named in the registry (14)

Shown in this order: most trials first.

Interventions as named in the registry
Drug Trials
Ropivacaine 2 % 2
Demineralized Bone Matrix 2
NuCel 2
Acupuncture 1
Oxycodone Acetaminophen 1

These are the names sponsors entered on ClinicalTrials.gov that we have not matched to a single molecule. Some are drugs under a brand or code name; others are procedures, doses or arm labels.

Which serious adverse events do Spondylolysis trials report? (10)

Shown in this order: most subjects affected first. Subjects affected summed across trials, a cross-trial signal, not a rate.

Serious adverse events in this condition's trials
Adverse event Subjects affected Trials
Not related to use of SPSI for surgical planning 24 1
Osteoarthritis 18 3
Revision Surgery for Malposition/Loosening 15 1
Adjacent segment degeneration 8 2
Intervertebral disc protrusion 8 2

Which publications cover Spondylolysis? (43)

Shown in this order: major-topic papers first, then newest, then most linked to trials.

Publications
Publication Journal Year Major topic
Immediate physical therapy is beneficial for adolescent athletes with active lumbar spondylolysis: a multicentre randomised trial. British journal of sports medicine 2026 Yes
T1-VIBE and STIR MRI of lumbar pars interarticularis injuries in elite athletes: fracture characterisation and potential prognostic indicators. Skeletal radiology 2024 Yes
Evaluation and Treatment of the Child with Acute Back Pain. Pediatric clinics of North America 2023 Yes
Immediate functional progression program in adolescent athletes with a spondylolysis. Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine 2021 Yes
Comparison of symptomatic spondylolysis in young soccer and baseball players. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2020 Yes

Sub-conditions in MeSH (1)

MeSH descendants one level down with at least one trial, most trials first.

Not on this page

Not measured: delivery record.

Checked, with nothing recorded for this condition: prevalence and rare-disease identity.

Browse all condition evidence pages